When lacking confidence/clarity look for an idea to possibly forward-test instead of trying to force a trade
#fintwit #orderflow #daytrading #dailyreportcard #tradinglifestyle #daytraderlife #grasshoppersanonymous #tradingforex #tradingcommodities #NEXT
Every trading day I recap my trades, including more than entries and exits. Why did I take the trade? How did I manage the trade, my emotions and cognitive function? All the good stuff as well as all the ugly of being a day trader. As always, feel free to reach out to me.
My weekly goal:
- Min. 3 times hitting the gym + mandatory cardio
- Not today. Gonna turn in early
- Only trade the main account
- Check
- Be mindful of DTTZs
- Check
- Only price-action based exit rules (or if hit time stop comes earlier)
- Check
- M15/M30 entries and exits at 1st DTTZ, M5 entries and exits at 2nd DTTZ
- Check
Good Pre-market routines
Bad Session PECS
Good Trade selection
Good Trade sizing or SL placement
Good Trade Execution & Mgmt.
Good Risk Adjusted Returns
Yes Daily review
Muppet meter (1 being best — 5 being worst): 2
Summary
- GBPNZD
- IB: IB accepted value somewhat but B traded and closed as an Inside Bar
- C: Extended below IB and closed as a Doji (possible Base) inside IB
- D: Extended 1.5xIBR below IB forming (for now) a normal variation day
- E: Closed as an Inside Bar with longer selling wick
- Putting a paper trade entry short at 1.92882, SL 1.93134, 1.92376 (2R) for a potential late-sustained auction entry based on a low/medium initiative activity day
- F: Closed as a DBD
- G: Closed Making LLs
- H: Made LLs closing on it’s low about 10 pips above H4 demand, H4 Bear Engulf
- Paper trade would have made 1.9R
- GOLD
- IB: A closed as a Bull ENgulf at M30 QLo, B as a dragonfly doji with long buying wick spanning all the way down to IB low (LN open)
- C: Extended and closed above IB within LTF supply
- D: Closed as an Inside Bar
- Placed a paper trade on a flimsy M15 Bear Engulfing with continuation as it closed on the M30 as a Bearish Inside Bar.
- E: Closed as a consolidation forming at VAL
- F: Traded and closed higher without making HHs
- G: Closed as a flimsy bear engulf
- H: Closed lower as a weak failed auction, H4 Inside Bar / possible consolidation
- Paper trade scratched making less than 0.1R
GBPNZD
- Which hypo played out and how did I hypothesize it playing out? How did it actually play out? What did the profile and price action show?
- Hypo 2 — Return to Value
- Narrative: H4 c‑sup at VAL
- Preferred: Strong Bearish PA possibly failing auction otherwise an extension down with sustained auction
- Con: Trading right into D1 demand and newly formed H4 c‑dem
- 100% correct
How accurate was my assessment of market context? What were the circumstances of the developing narrative? How did they develop according to DTTZ?
Exactly as hypothesized. A traded higher testing value through a flimsy acceptance where B closed as a Inside Bar. C extended below IB although closing as a doji. To which D just shot down extending (at the time) 1.5xIBR. I forward-tested a late-sustained auction entry off a pullback to IB low during E which at trading window close would have yielded 1.9R. More in overlap noise.
What was the play of the day?
Return to Value, with a test of value and H4 C‑sup located just above VAL. Makes for a strong combination.
Was I right on the outcome? Which Hypo played out and why was it not Hypo 1 (if any)?
Due to IB closing within value I expected a rotation first before continuing down.
Was there an opportunity and did I take it?
There was an opportunity but I did not take it due to trading right into H4/D1 demand. D1 demand has been tested multiple times but the H4 demand was newly formed premarket. I took notes for my playbook which I will post in my forward-testing thesis subcategory on my website.
DTTZ: 1st
Entry: EIther IB extension down or a late-sustained auction entry off a pullback to IB low coupled with a low/medium initiative activity day due to trading right into demand.
Profit Margin (ADR or congestion): Next H4 demand was at 2.4R and the trade moved 1.9R time-based. In overlap noise price went to test that H4 demand would have yielded 2.4R.
What would a price action exit rule have done?
1.9R same as time-based unless in overlap noise this went up to 2.4R
How was SL placement and Sizing?
SL placement wasn’t the best but since a late-sustained auction entry is expecting the same as a break of IB I expected some momentum behind the move. SL was at 1.93134 cutting through the selling wick in B. Entry 1.92882.
What would time-based have done?
1.9R
What could I have done better?
I did well to stay out as I wasn’t feeling sharp BUT the main reason was trading right into H4/D1 demand deterred me even though there was a thesis I found valid. Hence placing a paper trade.
How did I feel before, during, and after the trade?
No trade taken.
GOLD
- Which hypo played out and how did I hypothesize it playing out? How did it actually play out? What did the profile and price action show?
- Hypo 1 — Return to Value
- Narrative: Open sentiment, Medium timeframe bearish sentiment, H4 bearish inside bar at retest of H4 QHi after rejection.
- Preferred: Move higher to VAL extending IB (possibly testing H4 c‑sup at PPOC) early on to strong bearish PA at value edge to failed auction.
- Con: Larger timeframe bullish sentiment.
- 90% correct
How accurate was my assessment of market context? What were the circumstances of the developing narrative? How did they develop according to DTTZ?
As hypothesized although there was no real strong bearish PA and the move came in overlap noise.
What was the play of the day?
Return to Value play. Open sentiment (below value, outside range) in an uptrend. Price extended above to consolidate at value edge before reversing.
Was I right on the outcome? Which Hypo played out and why was it not Hypo 1 (if any)?
Yes I was
Was there an opportunity and did I take it?
Yes there was but not entirely according to my trading rule as the PA was rather flimsy but I took a ‘chance’ by placing a paper trade. Plus it would have been trading right into demand which I did not want to risk.
DTTZ: 1st
Entry: M30 Bearish Inside Bar/M15 Three Inside Down
Profit Margin (ADR or congestion): 1R at D1 demand that is high in distribution curve so could have potentially dug deeper where 2R would have been above H4 demand.
What would a price action exit rule have done?
0.1R
How was SL placement and Sizing?
SL placement would have been great, Short xx79.53 SL xx83.64
What would time-based have done?
0.1R
What could I have done better?
I did well to stay out and rather put on a paper trade saving mental capital
How did I feel before, during, and after the trade?
No trade taken
How well did I manage my physical, emotional and cognitive states?
I felt very tired throughout the session and was easily distracted. It was good of me to not trade. I gotta get my sleep back under control.
What did I learn today?
Sleep is everything when it comes to focus. I need not just hours in… but quality sleep.
What’s one thing I need to do more often?
Follow my process. Either for taking a trade or being the scientist and doing my research on possible setups through forward-testing hypotheses.
What’s one thing I need to do less often?
I think I did well today
Under the circumstances, did I perform at my best?
I did
For my trade plan(s) on this particular day, go here: