Summary: Forward-testing trading ideas is satisfying
#fintwit #orderflow #daytrading #dailyreportcard #tradinglifestyle #daytraderlife #grasshoppersanonymous #tradingforex #tradingcommodities #NEXT
Every trading day I recap my trades, including more than entries and exits. Why did I take the trade? How did I manage the trade, my emotions and cognitive function? All the good stuff as well as all the ugly of being a day trader. As always, feel free to reach out to me.
My weekly goal:
- Min. 3 times hitting the gym + mandatory cardio
- Weights, no cardio
- Only trade the main account
- No trades taken
- Be mindful of DTTZs
- Check
- Only price-action based exit rules (or if hit time stop comes earlier)
- No trades taken
- M15/M30 entries and exits at 1st DTTZ, M5 entries and exits at 2nd DTTZ
- No trades taken
Good Pre-market routines
Fair Session PECS
Good Trade selection
Good Trade sizing or SL placement
Good Trade Execution & Mgmt.
Good Risk Adjusted Returns
Yes Daily review
Muppet meter (1 being best — 5 being worst): 1
Summary
- GBPNZD
- IB: M30 consolidation at M30 VWAP in DT
- C: Consolidation continued through inside Bar, forward testing a large imbalance, H4 continuation to possible D1 phase 4 thesis negating H4 QLo and W1 demand
- D: Boom… price traversed 1.5R below IB exhausting ADR. Still did well to sit this one out as it was trading right into W1 demand.
- E: CLosed making LL, no reaction from demand (yet)
- F: Poor Low formed while F is retracing to fill the gap between E and D. Gap still there and made a LL
- G: Made LLs
- H: Made LLs
- I: Closed as an Inside Bar at D1 demand
- GOLD
- IB: A closed as a Bear Engulf, B as a doji
- C: Closed as a Morning Star
- D: Closed as an Inside bar with selling wick
- E: Closed as Three Outside Down extending slightly below IB
- F: Made a slight LL
- G: Closed down without making a new low
- H: Closed asa doji making a poor low
- I: Closed as a Morning Star
GBPNZD
- Which hypo played out and how did I hypothesize it playing out? How did it actually play out? What did the profile and price action show?
- Hypo 3 — Trend Continuation
- Narrative: H4 continuation in D1 phase 4 narrative
- Preferred: Strong Bearish price action, IB extension down reaching for D1 demand, exhausting ADR
- Con: W1 demand below
- 100% correct
How accurate was my assessment of market context? What were the circumstances of the developing narrative? How did they develop according to DTTZ?
There was a momentum extension down in D TPO to which I put a paper trade to forward test a potential play I had seen before. Not sure what to call it yet but I’ll come up with something during review. After exhausting ADR price kept making LLs and a time-based close would have yielded 3.1R.
What was the play of the day?
Trend Continuation. D1 Bearish Inside Bar, H4 phase 4, large imbalance at the open signaling strength, IB extension down taking out LTF demand then exhausting ADR right into W1/D1 demand.
Was I right on the outcome? Which Hypo played out and why was it not Hypo 1 (if any)?
Yes I was. Even though Hypo 3 was my most likely scenario based on my own personal experience I thought to put a mean reversion as Hypo 1 as I had not confirmed for myself a large imbalance in this setting before.
Was there an opportunity and did I take it?
There was none based on my current trading rules although I did document a Trend Continuation setup for my playbook.
DTTZ: 1st
Entry: Momentum IB extension
Profit Margin (ADR or congestion): 1R at W1 demand 2.5R at D1
What would a price action exit rule have done?
2.5R based off M5 exit
How was SL placement and Sizing?
Would have been good. Entry at x.xx2x, SL at x.xx48 above IB and formation
What would time-based have done?
3.1R
What could I have done better?
I did well to observe this particular setting where I would be trading right into a W1/D1 demand area.
How did I feel before, during, and after the trade?
No trade taken
GOLD
- Which hypo played out and how did I hypothesize it playing out? How did it actually play out? What did the profile and price action show?
- Hypo 3 — Mean Reversion
- Narrative: Large imbalance at the open
- Preferred: Strong bearish price action taking out LTF demand with sustained auction
- Con: H4 bull engulf with long buying wick (2nd chance entry D1 bull Engulf)
- 70% correct
How accurate was my assessment of market context? What were the circumstances of the developing narrative? How did they develop according to DTTZ?
I actually think it was more Hypo 2 responsive activity playing out due to the market not really making a move due to being stuck between newly developed demand and the large imbalance as it is.
What was the play of the day?
No real play.
Was I right on the outcome? Which Hypo played out and why was it not Hypo 1 (if any)?
I was although the momentum I was hoping for Hypo 1 to have did not come and thus moves on to Hypo 2 and 3
Was there an opportunity and did I take it?
There was no opportunity under current trading rules
What could I have done better?
Nothing.
How did I feel before, during, and after the trade?
No trade taken
How well did I manage my physical, emotional and cognitive states?
I did well although did get a bit tired again even though I did not eat heavy. Did not sleep well last night so that was probably it.
What did I learn today?
Forward-testing a trading idea is almost as satisfying as actually executing a trade on it.
What’s one thing I need to do more often?
Only execute when I have confidence in a play.
What’s one thing I need to do less often?
Forward-test trading ideas I keep seeing recurring in the markets.
Under the circumstances, did I perform at my best?
I did well today
For my trade plan(s) on this particular day, go here: