#dailyreportcard #daytrading #tradinglifestyle #daytraderlife #grasshoppersanonymous #tradingforex #tradingcommodities #NEXT
Summary: One foot in front of the other
Every trading day I recap my trades, including more than entries and exits. Why did I take the trade? How did I manage the trade, my emotions and cognitive function? All the good stuff as well as all the ugly of being a day trader. As always, feel free to reach out to me.
My weekly goal: Formulate hypos in order of likelihood and track with actual development on the day
Good Pre-market routines
Good Session PECS
Bad Trade selection
Good Trade sizing or SL placement
Bad Trade Execution & Mgmt.
Good Risk Adjusted Returns
Yes Daily review
Muppet meter (1 being best — 5 being worst): 3
Summary: One foot in front of the other
- GBPNZD — Trend Day
- LN open below value outside range and proceeded down to ADR 0.5 at M30 QLo
- C: Entry Long 2.00024 SL 1.996760 TP 2.00506 as per Hypo 1
- Early entry on M15 Morning Star at ADR 0.5 and M30 QLo coinciding with H4-C‑S 1.99938
- Reasons for entry: LN open outside value outside range, IB wider than usual trading at ADR 0.5 and M30 QLO plus nearby H4-C‑D 1.99938 Big Con: H4 Phase 3 transition into Phase 4
- C closed as a DBD and sustained auction through LLs and IB extension
- D: Hypo 1 invalidated for now. Closed as continuation down with LLs. Hypo 2 seems to be in play.
- A further expansion on hypo 2 could be the following: Due to IB range wider than usual (even though in ‘normal cases’ this means probably no momentum plays), if in combination with a H4 Phase 3 to 4 transition (further supported by DBD on M30 and H1) we could see a continuation negating the mean reversion. Further factors to support this play would be a sustained auction, ADR exhaustion during LN for a possible unidirectional session.
- E: Closed as a continuation and continued to make LLs with no signs yet of a reversal, M15 closed as a base which hints to further continuation, ADR exhausted
- F: Took out M30 demand at ADR exhaustion as well as H4 demand, closed as continuation,
- G: LLs
Hypos
- Was I right on the direction of the session?
- According to hypo 2 yes but not according to Hypo 1 (which was flawed in its assumption outlined underneath)
- Which hypo played out (if any)?
- Hypo 2 played out 90%
- I take off the 10% due to mis-reading the LN open in my hypothesis
- Hypo 2 played out 90%
- How did I hypothesize it playing out?
- I hypothesized a wider than usual IB range and exhausting ADR ‘early on’ with a sustained auction
- How did it actually play out? What did the profile and price action show?
- Market opened below value within range after a H4 phase 3 transition into 4. Profile showed a sustained auction through LLs and IB extension and we did exhaust ADR (during LN is more likely to see a continuation) taking out lower and medium time frame demand ZOIs.
How accurate was my assessment of market context? Was I aligned with market context?
- I gave validity to a H4 c‑line that I should not have done. This caused me to believe there was an alignment for a possible mean reversion play.
- Somehow I failed to register that LN open was below value and inside range and instead was outside range further enhancing the notion of a possible mean reversion
- Normally I post my prep 2 hours before market open. Today I decided to switch it up and post after I sit at my desk getting ready to trade. I had written most of the prep beforehand and decided I should wait for LN open to finalize the hypos. This was a bit tight but not undoable. Will continue experimenting with this since it offers a more complete picture of potential hypos I summarize in the prep.
- Solution: double check 00 on profile next time (even though you can see it from the candle as well) Very silly mistake and that’s enough negativity since I placed a rule in place to offer a solution for next time.
- When I switched to Hypo 2 I think I did well reading profile as well as price action and context ie ADR exhaustion during LN to further enhance my bias of a unidirectional day
- This is further enhancing with the confirmation through a moderate imbalance due to open below value but within range
How did I feel before, during, and after the trade?
- I felt frustrated fumbling around with FX synergy. Solution: don’t take trades when FX synergy is not working. This again feeds into the idea that somehow I have to ‘hurry’ and make a lot of trades. Relax and trade whenever everything aligns. That means no fumbling either.
- I feel good afterwards. Learned a lot today and getting back into the groove of being the scientist.
How well did I follow my process?
- I thought I did well here but made a few mistakes outlined above that caused me to misread the narrative.
How well did I manage my physical, emotional and cognitive states?
- I did well here. I will experiment skipping a meal or not really skipping just changing the time of the meal I have to later in the session or afterwards
What did I learn today?
- H4 c‑lines validity 24 hours not longer
- Check placement exact open
What’s one thing I need to do more often?
- Failing to success. Fail. Review. Improve. Repeat.
What’s one thing I need to do less often?
- Feed negative thoughts. Move on. #NEXT
Under the circumstances, did I perform at my best?
- I did okay here. I should have picked up on the open. This is a rookie mistake. Learn and improve.
For my trade plan(s) on this particular day, go here: